School Alerts and Lock Downs After Murders

Tools

School Alerts and Lock Downs After Murders

By Josh Hinkle, Anchor/Reporter

By Josh Hinkle

IOWA CITY - Word of the Sueppel family murders spread across the Iowa City community quickly, largely due to a new warning system at the University of Iowa - one that police say might have caused more harm than good this time.

When university officials heard about the murders from police, they turned to the Hawk Alert system. With it, they warned 45,000 people with a call or text in about 20 minutes.

Branko Popovic, a university sophomore, says, "It was kind of stupid. It didn't tell you anything like to go to class of don't go to class. Just kind of useless, and it made people panic."

The first Hawk Alert, which also went out on the Web, said an active shooter was in the area. It gave students a description of the person at large and told them to call 911, if they saw him. But that's about it.

Iowa City Police Sgt. Troy Kelsay, says, "It caused a bottleneck. It caused switchboards to light up. It caused gridlock here at the police department. It became difficult to make the calls and receive the calls and dispatch officers."

Police say that message prompted hundreds of calls to their department from across the country from students, parents and staff worried about a possibly dangerous situation on campus. A second Hawk Alert told students that the campus was under no threat.

University freshman Caitlin Krater says, "I just got scared for no reason, but I appreciate that they sent out so many alerts."

Alerts with information, but no real direction. Students say, until that second message, they weren't sure if it was safe to go to class.

Lindsey Streit, another university sophomore, says, "It felt like, if there was an active shooter running around, we shouldn't be out and about."

Freshman Jon Hackbarth says, "I definitely think I appreciate it. With everything that's going on at other colleges like what happened at NIU, it's definitely necessary, I think."

Police agree that students need notification, but the system needs tweaking. The university began to realize this throughout the day. The final Hawk Alert told students to not call police unless they had specific information about the crime.

Kelsay says, "I'm very understanding where the university came from. They're kind of damned if they do and damned it they don't. If they don't release it and something ends up happening here on campus, they're going to be crucified."

The university says it could work better with the police for more detailed information before issuing a Hawk Alert. The Iowa City Public School system faced a similar situation when police lacked details on the crime. Administrators there actually locked down all 24 of the district's buildings before finding out there was no threat to schools.

Email Josh Hinkle at Josh.Hinkle@kcrg.com

Monday, Mar 31 at 4:40 PM Tom wrote ...

If you got into trouble because you stayed away from class due to the alerts, go talk to the department chair, and the dean if you have to. I can't guarantee anything, but I'm a former TA--departments won't want bad press. Talk to the chair. If that doesn't work, go to the dean. If that doesn't get you anywhere, let the Daily Iowan know. Include the department and professor's name. If you just used it as an excuse, don't bother. But if you were honestly worried, fight it, because it's BS.

Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Mar 25 at 1:09 PM anon wrote ...

Its better that an alert went out... stop complaining it made more work for people... it could have saved lives, these things aren't going to be perfect the first time around, but at least everyone knew to keep their eyes peeled. Better safe than sorry any day, no matter the headache it may cause a few people

Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Mar 25 at 11:23 AM Parent Wrote... wrote ...

The safety of my child while attending the U of I is paramount - I do however question the alert being sent out without accurate information concerning the threat - I know there were deaths involved and uncertain as to the cause of death or even if there truly was a threat to the students - This alert is necessary but will we be alerted to all murders in Iowa City or a person with a gun robbing a convenience store? There needs to be a better standard as to when the alert needs to be sent -

Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Mar 25 at 9:54 AM a Mom wrote ...

As a parent, I could care less if you miss a quiz. I am most concerned with the safety of my child. If you happen to have died in a tragedy like that you mom is not going to say, "well at least he/she took his/her quiz". Come on - get real here. Where are your priorities???

Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Mar 25 at 7:09 AM dork wrote ...

The system needs NOT to be a " voice automated" system???? Cant understand , I had to listen about 3 times before I could make out what it said. Need a live voice "HELLO"

Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Mar 25 at 12:21 AM concerned wrote ...

I dont think it is fair that the University issues these alerts, leaves the decision of personal safety up to the student, then punishes the students for erring on the side of caution. I went to class, but several classmates did not until late because they commute and received the message while on the road. Our instructor gave a quiz and refused a make-up option to those who were late. How is that fair?

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 10:57 PM Anonymous wrote ...

How lucky are we to live in a community to know that despite the insanity of the world that we are given information to help us use OUR MINDS to take information and then to be able to decide for OURselves what is best under any given situation...I'm glad to know the system works and maybe has a few bugs to be worked on..All good things start somewhere...

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 10:27 PM student wrote ...

All 3 Universities have been locked down sometime within the last month!

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 10:06 PM Parent of UI Freshman wrote ...

My daughter called and wanted to know whether to go to class or not. The alert did not tell them what to do. Isn't that our job as parents? The students could also make that decision. I applaud the University for its efforts to keep everyone informed. Maybe that was all the information they had when they issued the alert. Keep up the good work. Improvements can always be made as time goes on. All the students are alive and well. Thank you.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 9:28 PM Student wrote ...

The system is usually helpful, but in this case it gave no details as to what happened, or what was actually going on. From the sound of the first message I thought there was some psycho cruising around in his van popping off kids out his window. I think if we are not granted any real information as to what is actually going on, the hawk alert system is pointless. We need full details if we are going to protect ourselves in the future.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 9:27 PM UI Student wrote ...

It was a good time to use the hawk alert the only thing that they need to do is think about what is being said in the message. When it says there is an "active shooter" and than gives a description of the car it gives the idea that someone is actively shooting somewhere in Iowa City, which wasn't the case when the message went out. Also some direction of what students should do instead of just informing us of what is going on would have defiantly helped.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 9:20 PM Tammy wrote ...

I think the Hawk Alert did what it was supposed to do. Yes, there could have been more information, but safety was the first concern. Information came later. You just never know these days.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 9:06 PM Kristin (UI Senior) wrote ...

I got the first call this morning and was terrified. It gave no indication of what students should do, or what had actually happened. I'm glad the university took steps to inform us, but they should have been much more specific about what was going on, and should have given instruction about classes. I skipped work based on my horror at the original message.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 8:50 PM Adam wrote ...

We are a nation of fear.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 8:25 PM Stefani wrote ...

It sounds like there are mixed reactions to the U of I's attempt to protect their students. As with any new system, there will be hiccups in implementing it, and each situation will bring new lessons to learn in the notification process. All in all though, hats off to the U of I for being proactive, and protecting their students.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 8:23 PM ~D~ wrote ...

Better to have locked up and BE Safe. Then not know at all. My hats off to the U of I and the trans system for getting the word out, and keeping extra eyes out. The word spread fast kids were safe, and so were the general public. My prayers are for the Sueppels family and friends and for the City of Iowa City.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 8:10 PM Regina Utz wrote ...

Notwithstanding the need for minor changes in the Hawk Alert system: it did what it must do: that being; alerted hundreds of people that there had been active gunfire in the IC area. A bit of inconvenience is a small price to pay for the protection that the Hawk Alert provides. I think Lindsey Streit stated it right: "It felt like, if there was an active shooter running around, we shouldn't be out and about." That's the point of the Hawk Alert: that being there could be danger be alert.

Flag for moderation

Monday, Mar 24 at 8:08 PM student wrote ...

The hawk alert would have been more effective if it would have described in greater detail the extent of the threat. It is definately a necessary precaution, but in this case did case increased panic among students. In order to be more effective, more information needs to be available.

Flag for moderation

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

By submitting a comment to this web site, I affirm that I have read, understand, agree to and shall abide by the following rules and regulations as a term and condition of all comments which I may post. As terms and conditions of using this KCRG web site, I agree that I am fully responsible for the contents of all statements which I make. To the best of my knowledge, all such statements are true, fair, and accurate. I shall not post any statements which attack a person’s integrity or moral character, expose a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, deprive a person of the benefits of public confidence and social dealings, or injure a person in the maintenance of that person’s business. I shall not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of a third person. I shall not post content that is false, liable, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a person’s right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law or that is otherwise inappropriate. I acknowledge that if I post a comment which violates this policy that an offended person to whom comments are directed may have a right through judicial process to determine my identity and make a claim against me for damages. I agree that I shall indemnify KCRG, its employees, agents, representatives and affiliates from any and all expenses KCRG may incur as a result of comments I post which violate this policy, claims and/or damages, including but not limited to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. KCRG is not responsible for the contents posted or anything arising out of the use of the contents or other interaction and has no obligation or duty to monitor or control any posting but does reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove, or edit user generated comment.

Athlete of the Week
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
More On Demand

What's On KCRG

12:00
All My Children
1:00
One Life to Live
2:00
General Hospital
3:00
Rachael Ray