Iowa Supreme Court Adds Twist to Medical Malpractice Opinion

Tools

By Becky Ogann

DES MOINES (AP) - The Iowa Supreme Court has sent two medical malpractice lawsuits back to district court.

Friday's decision affects a breast cancer patient and a woman who had liver problems as a teenager. It offers a new opinion on how the statute of limitations can be interpreted. The decision could allow more leeway for when patients can file negligence claims.

Justices ruled that the statute's two-year window should begin when patients know the extent and cause of their illness or injury -- not necessarily when their symptoms are initially diagnosed.

The district courts, citing previous Supreme Court opinions, had dismissed both malpractice lawsuits after deciding the limitations period had expired.

Justices acknowledge that the lower courts correctly applied the law. However, they say a different interpretation was needed to better protect patients. The Supreme Court says the lawmakers can intervene if they believe the rulings violate the statute's purpose.

Conversation Guidelines

Be Kind

Don't use abusive, offensive, threatening, racist, vulgar or sexually-oriented language.
Don't attack someone personally. Keep it civil and be responsible.

Share Knowledge

Be truthful. Share what you know and what you are passionate about.
What more do you want to learn? Keep it simple.

Stay focused

Promote lively and healthy debate. Stay on topic. Ask questions and give feedback on the story's topic.

Report Trouble

Help us maintain a quality comment section by reporting comments that are offensive. If you see a comment that is offensive, or you feel violates our guidelines, simply click on the "x" to the far right of the comment to report it.


read the full guidelines here »

Commenting will be disabled on stories dealing with the following subject matter: Violent crime, sexual abuse, Amber Alerts, Operation Quickfinds and suicides.

More Good Stuff

What's On KCRG